Wednesday, February 29, 2012

NYT: Prosecutors Doubtful They Will Charge MFG Execs, May Levy a $140k Fine

The NYT reported yesterday that it is now doubtful that prosecutors will pursue charges against MF Global executives, including Jon Corzine over the theft of $1.2 Billion in client segregated funds- BUT...they may impose a penalty of $140,000.
Yes, you read that correctly.  Steal $1.2 billion from clients, receive a fine of $140,000, and Do Not Go To Jail, Proceed to Go (next lucrative bankster job) and Collect another $200 ($20 million in bonuses).
Federal authorities are struggling to find evidence (um...whaaat!?!) to support a criminal case stemming from the collapse of MF Global, even after a federal grand jury in Chicago has issued subpoenas.

Investigators, unable to find a smoking gun (ok, how about wire transfers to JPMorgan Chase, can you find those!?!) amid thousands of e-mails and documents, increasingly suspect that chaos and poor risk control systems prompted the disappearance of more than $1 billion in customer money, according to several people involved in the case. (Who would that be, Jon Corzine and Jamie Dimon!?!)
When the money first went missing, prosecutors in New York and Chicago scrambled to stake a claim. Now, four months later, both Preet S. Bharara, the United States attorney in Manhattan, and Patrick J. Fitzgerald, his counterpart in Chicago, are shying away from leading the case, one of those people involved in the case said.
Indeed, a number of federal prosecutors have expressed doubts to others involved in the case that anyone at MF Global — including the firm’s chief executive, Jon S. Corzine, and back-office employees in Chicago — intentionally misused customer money, said people involved in the case who were not authorized to speak publicly about the investigation.
The subpoenas by the grand jury in Chicago were disclosed by the CME Group, MF Global’s chief regulator, in a securities filing on Tuesday. But the grand jury, according to the person involved in the case, has yet to hear any evidence on the case — a sign that the investigation has yet to bear fruit.

Still, it is early in the investigation, and regulators and others have yet to finish plowing through the mountain of documentation they recently received from the company.
In addition, authorities have yet to interview key witnesses — including a person who is believed to have transferred client funds in the firm’s final days. (You can't interview the main witness in 4 months!?! Are you kidding me!?!)
The inability to bring a criminal case would certainly disappoint thousands of clients, including farmers, traders and hedge fund managers, who are still without access to at least a third of their money.
The government is still hopeful it can file a civil suit against the company, people close to the case said, though doing so against a bankrupt firm with a long line of creditors could be seen as more symbolic than substantive.
Such a case would most likely center on the firm’s failure to safeguard client money, a cardinal sin in the world of futures firms. The penalty for improperly dipping into customer money is a roughly $140,000 fine, equal to about a thousandth of the overall shortfall that clients are enduring
Read more: